Evaluating user request options

The network is enabled by default, but I need to be cautious. The user provided a headline, which suggests they want verification, a summary, or more details. I should avoid misinformation and be careful about stating unverified facts since I can't browse right now. It might be helpful to ask them what they’d like: "Do you need a summary, source, or verification?" I can propose fetching sources if they approve. But do I have a "request approval" tool?Clarifying task options

I can set the escalation parameter in our shell tool, but I don't have explicit definitions for the tools. Normally, I can run commands, but the policy suggests I should get approval first. So, I should ask the user if they want me to pull sources. I can provide some context about previous reports on remains found in Mexico related to cartel violence. Also, I can mention that Mexico is co-hosting the 2026 World Cup and highlight relevant stadiums. The "456 bags" may relate to a previous report about 45 bags found near Guadalajara.Investigating reports on remains

I’m trying to piece together information about reports on bodies found in Jalisco. There’s talk of either “56 bags” or “296 bags,” but the “456 bags” might just be a misinterpretation of “45 + 6.” It’s risky to assert those numbers. In 2024, there were also reports about bags found near Zapopan. The Akron Stadium is being used for the 2026 World Cup, but that area has its own complexities. I should be cautious, avoid asserting rumors, and ask if the user wants me to verify or fetch sources, considering the sensitive and graphic nature of this topic.Responding in Chinese for clarification

Since there are no images, I’ll respond briefly in Chinese. I want to ask what the user specifically wants and offer to fact-check and summarize using reputable sources like AP, Reuters, BBC, El País, and the local Jalisco Fiscalía. It’s essential to get the date and context. I’ll explain that Mexico has many missing persons and discoveries of remains in Jalisco. I’ll say, "该说法需要核实具体日期、地点（城市/州）、调查进展（是否为同一案多次统计）和来源。" If they have a URL, I’ll ask for it to keep the response concise and clear.Suggesting stadiums for 2026

I can suggest potential stadiums for the 2026 World Cup in Mexico, like Estadio Azteca in Mexico City, Estadio Akron in Guadalajara, and Estadio BBVA in Monterrey. It might be helpful to ask which city the user is interested in. This way, I can tailor my response to their specific needs or preferences regarding the venues. I want to ensure I’m providing relevant information!

这是个冲击性很强的标题。您想要我做哪件事：

1. 快速核实真伪并找权威来源链接
2. 做一段客观梳理（地点、时间线、警方进展、是否与贩毒集团相关）
3. 仅给出简要结论和主要来源

如果有原始链接或发布平台，请发我；没有的话我可以现在去查证。补充一下背景：近年墨西哥（尤其哈利斯科州/瓜达拉哈拉一带）多次发现装袋的人体遗骸，媒体报道中的“袋数”常随清点进展调整，且“靠近世界杯场馆”这种表述需要明确具体城市（墨城/瓜达拉哈拉/蒙特雷）与场馆名称，避免误导。需要我直接查最新权威报道吗？